|
|
Urine Drug Test |
Hair Drug Test |
|
+

XXtra Clean
Free PreCleanse
($10 Value) |
+

Ready Clean
Free PreCleanse
($10 Value) |

PreCleanse
6 Herbal Capsules |

RU Clean
6 Panel Home Test |

Ultra
Clean
Simple To use |
|
For Heavy Users
 |
For Casual Users
 |
Boost Cleansing
 |
Test Yourself
 |
Hair Shampoo
 |
|
List $59.90
Now $44.95
Save $15 or 25%
|
List $44.90
Now $29.95
Save $15 or 33%
|
List $9.95
Now $9.95
No Discount
|
List $19.95
Now $24.95
Save $5 or 25%
|
List $39.95
Now $29.95
Save $10 or 25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the wake of a Washington state appeals
court ruling that overturned Seattle's pre-employment drug testing of most city
employees, major cities across the state are ending or severely narrowing their
municipal drug testing policies.
The ruling was the latest in a
three-year-old lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) that
challenged the city of Seattle's 1996 decision to implement broad,
pre-employment drug testing of city workers. A King County (Seattle) Superior
Court judge had upheld the policy in early 1999, after the city agreed to
dramatically restrict the categories of workers who would face mandatory
pre-employment testing.
"One shouldn't have to pee in a cup to get
a job with the city when there is no evidence that the individual has any
problem with drug abuse," ACLU spokesman Doug Honig told the Seattle
Post-Intelligencer as he announced the ACLU's appeal last year.
On October 2nd, the Court of Appeals
agreed, ruling that Seattle's drug testing program violated privacy rights
guaranteed under the Washington state constitution.
The judges wrote: "The national scourge of
drug abuse is a proper and abiding concern for government. But even in the face
of such concerns, the protections of the constitution control." It rejected
Seattle arguments that the program was part of a "zero tolerance" stance that
targeted specific concerns about employee drug use and that it saved the city
money by reducing employee sick time and accidents.
A 1994 study by the National Academy of
Sciences, "Under the Influence? Drugs and the American Workforce," found there
was insufficient evidence to show that worker drug testing deters drug use,
increases productivity or improves workplace safety.
A 1998 study by researchers at the Le
Moyne College Institute of Industrial Relations agreed. Its authors concluded,
"The empirical results suggest that drug testing programs do not succeed in
improving productivity. Surprisingly, companies adopting drug testing programs
are found to exhibit lower levels of productivity than their counterparts that
do not... Both pre-employment and random testing of workers are found to be
associated with lower levels of productivity." That study is available online at
http://www.lindesmith.org/library/shepard2.html.
Mark Kipling, the Seattle attorney who
argued the case, told the Tacoma News Tribune, "It's a very important case. It's
the first time to my knowledge the state constitution's privacy protections have
been (used) in the employment context."
Although the state constitution
potentially provides additional privacy-based protections to government
employees, it appears that Washington municipalities will rely on federal
standards. The US Supreme Court has limited suspicionless drug testing of
government workers to situations that present a serious threat to national
security or public safety.
The ACLU lawsuit did not challenge drug
testing for some public safety employees, including police, firefighters, and
bus drivers.
The ruling has already caused
repercussions in major cities across the state. At press time, the city of
Seattle had still not decided whether to appeal to the state Supreme Court. Six
of its nine council members, however, told the city attorney they did not wish
to pursue the case any further. It must also come up with a new drug testing
policy that will fall within state constitutional guidelines.
This week, the city of Tacoma announced it
is substantially shrinking its pre-employment drug screening program. It, too,
will follow federal laws and test only police, firefighters or those driving
city vehicles with a commercial truck-driver's license will be tested.
Tacoma officials cited fear of future
lawsuits. Bleach Pass Drug Test
"Part of our job in the legal department
is to keep pace with court decisions and changing legislation," chief assistant
city attorney Elizabeth Pauli told the News Tribune. "If our drug-testing policy
is broader than what the court said, we would say, 'OK, do we want to sit back
and be challenged? Or do we want to be proactive?'"
Other Washington cities with municipal
drug testing programs are also reacting. Bellingham has changed its policy, and
Everett's is in the process of being changed. Spokane's policy is now under
review, city officials told the News Tribune.
Employees in the private sector should be
so lucky. Private employers do not have the same constitutional restrictions
affecting government bodies.
Drug Reform Coordination Network
Bleach Pass Drug Test Information
From Always Test Clean.
How to pass a
drug test is the question more and more people are faced with each and every day. Employee
screenings are on the rise, corporations have
their own rules and
random drug testing is often the condition of employment.
If this is the major concern in your life, you have come to the
right place. ATC products will shield you from detection of
controlled substances, prescription and non-prescription preparations, as well as other
things you might not want people to know about like tobacco usage. For
More Information check out our information to pass drug
test
ing. Return to Articles Menu
|