|
|
Urine Drug Test |
Hair Drug Test |
|
+

XXtra Clean
Free PreCleanse
($10 Value) |
+

Ready Clean
Free PreCleanse
($10 Value) |

PreCleanse
6 Herbal Capsules |

RU Clean
6 Panel Home Test |

Ultra
Clean
Simple To use |
|
For Heavy Users
 |
For Casual Users
 |
Boost Cleansing
 |
Test Yourself
 |
Hair Shampoo
 |
|
List $59.90
Now $44.95
Save $15 or 25%
|
List $44.90
Now $29.95
Save $15 or 33%
|
List $9.95
Now $9.95
No Discount
|
List $19.95
Now $24.95
Save $5 or 25%
|
List $39.95
Now $29.95
Save $10 or 25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January, 09 2002 - 9:00 a.m.
Redding defense attorney Jeffrey Stotter
said he has at least one client who might be sitting in prison after an
inaccurate drug test.
Patricia Griffith, is serving 10 years in
prison for a vehicular manslaughter conviction that involved the use of alcohol
- and a blood sample drawn by lab owner George Goehring.
Griffith and other defendants had a right
to know the man who drew blood samples for suspected drunken drivers and drug
users was the focus of a four-year investigation, Stotter said.
He said Shasta County District Attorney
McGregor Scott should have shared that information with defense attorneys.
"A jury gets to decide whether there's
anything to it. The district attorney doesn't," Stotter said.
The state attorney general's office has
been investigating Goehring, 62, of Redding, since a 1998 inquiry at Scott's
request.
Scott said he learned last week that
Goehring remained under investigation although preliminary reports he received
in 1998 showed no wrongdoing. Based on reports he received last week, he ordered
an in-house review of all cases handled by Goehring's lab since Jan. 1, 1998.
That includes any case where Goehring did work, tested or drew blood, Scott
said.
"This is all precautionary," he said,
stressing there is no evidence that Goehring's tests wrongly convicted
defendants.
Since Friday, Assistant District Attorney
Greg Gaul and Senior Deputy District Attorney Howard Welch have spent several
hours a day sorting through cases, Scott said.
Felony cases and defendants serving time
take priority, Scott said. Two prosecutors are taking an inventory.
"We're doing our homework," he said.
Several hundred blood and urine samples
still exist, but the Department of Justice will test each only if that
particular case warrants it, Scott said.
He does not foresee all the samples being
retested, he said.
For example, a hypothetical case of a
defendant charged with car theft and being under the influence of drugs would
probably not be re-examined if the defendant pleaded guilty only to the car
theft charge, Scott said.
His office hasn't made a final decision on
how carefully prosecutors will review cases where Goehring only drew blood, but
didn't test it, Scott said.
"We're better off right now devoting our
time to cases where there was an actual test," he said.
At that time, Shasta County coroner's
office employees said Goehring's test results differed from an Oakland lab's
tests of the same samples.
Goehring sold his business, Goehring
Forensic Laboratory, in July, but had tested drugs for law enforcement agencies
since 1986. Goehring's findings became evidence in court cases the district
attorney said he is now reviewing, dating back four years.
Goehring said he and his lab were licensed
by the state, contrary to what Scott had said previously, citing statements in a
Department of Justice report. Goehring said he has been a licensed clinical lab
scientist since the early 1960s.
Scott also said in a letter sent to
defense attorneys this week that he will make available investigative reports by
the Department of Justice and Redding Police Department.
Three Redding attorneys requested those
documents Tuesday, Scott said.
Stotter said he gained court orders for
the district attorney to share the findings of the reports, which allegedly
incriminate Goehring.
"My take is that for four years, the
district attorney's office has known about this, and they chose to do nothing.
The reports were buried," he said.
A Shasta County jury found Stotter's
client, Griffith, guilty on March 23 for driving drunk March 26, 1999, and
killing 11-year-old Redding boy Pa Choy Saechao. Griffith was sentenced to 10
years.
During her trial, the prosecution's drug
test - taken by Goehring about two hours after the collision - showed Griffith's
blood alcohol level at 0.07, Stotter said. The defense's test of the same sample
by a different lab showed a level of 0.009, Stotter said.
"The jury apparently gave more weight to
the government's test. And you can understand why. We'd all like to think that
the government is fair and just and honest, and most of the time I think it is.
But there is a link in this chain that is made of cardboard. And they hid it
from us," Stotter said.
In a letter sent late last week, Redding
defense attorney James Wilson told Scott he will no longer agree to the truth of
drug test result evidence, based on the prior use of Goehring's results in
criminal cases.
He is irate over Scott's actions, he said.
How Do You Pass A Drug Test
"He needs to resign his office. That guy
needs to go. And I will be satisfied with nothing less," Wilson said.
How Do You Pass A Drug Test
Information From Always Test Clean.
How to pass a
drug test is the question more and more people are faced with each and every day. Employee
screenings are on the rise, corporations have
their own rules and
random drug testing is often the condition of employment.
If this is the major concern in your life, you have come to the
right place. ATC products will shield you from detection of
controlled substances, prescription and non-prescription preparations, as well as other
things you might not want people to know about like tobacco usage. For
More Information check out our information to
pass drug
test
ing. Return to Articles Menu
|