|
|
Urine Drug Test |
Hair Drug Test |
|
+

XXtra Clean
Free PreCleanse
($10 Value) |
+

Ready Clean
Free PreCleanse
($10 Value) |

PreCleanse
6 Herbal Capsules |

RU Clean
6 Panel Home Test |

Ultra
Clean
Simple To use |
|
For Heavy Users
 |
For Casual Users
 |
Boost Cleansing
 |
Test Yourself
 |
Hair Shampoo
 |
|
List $59.90
Now $44.95
Save $15 or 25%
|
List $44.90
Now $29.95
Save $15 or 33%
|
List $9.95
Now $9.95
No Discount
|
List $19.95
Now $24.95
Save $5 or 25%
|
List $39.95
Now $29.95
Save $10 or 25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta Journal-Constitution (GA) Op-Ed,
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 -- Imagine going to your doctor for routine medical treatment
and supplying a urine sample.
The doctor exits the examination room,
goes down the hall and, without your knowledge or consent, tests your urine for
illicit drugs.
As you wait in your patient's gown, the
police enter the room, handcuff and shackle you, and take you off to prison on
charges of drug possession.
Is it legal for you to be tested without
your consent? Is it legal for your doctor to call the police if you test
positive? Is it legal for you to incriminate yourself with your own blood or
urine?
These are the questions involved in the
Ferguson v. City of Charleston (S.C.) case argued last week before the U.S.
Supreme Court.
Now add to the mix the question of fetal
rights. In 1989, the nurses and physicians at one public hospital in Charleston
worked with local police to institute a policy whereby pregnant women were
tested for cocaine and, after one positive drug test, were arrested at the
hospital by the police. Over five years, police arrested 30 women at the Medical
University of South Carolina for "child abuse" on these grounds. Some were taken
to jail during their eighth month of pregnancy. Others were arrested in their
hospital gowns, still bleeding from childbirth, to jail.
Six months after initiating the policy,
MUSC added an option whereby women who tested positive could enter in-patient
drug treatment instead of going to jail. But many of the women arrested were
never offered this option; others say they rejected it because it required them
to leave their other children.
Ten women who were arrested sued the state
of South Carolina on the grounds that the policy violated their Fourth Amendment
protection against illegal search and seizure. According to established law, the
government must obtain a warrant based on probable cause that a crime is being
committed before searching for evidence to be used in an arrest.
The court has made only limited exceptions
to this rule in "special needs" cases, where, for instance, taking the time to
get a warrant might result in imminent harm to others (such as in drunken
driving cases).
In the Ferguson case, the state of South
Carolina argued that concern over damage to fetal health constituted just such a
special need and that a fetus was the third party in danger from maternal drug
use. But, as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg asked the attorney for South Carolina
in oral argument, how does the arrest of women, some after childbirth, protect
fetal health?
Who decides which women get tested and
which do not? MUSC targeted women with criteria as vague as "inadequate prenatal
care." Such wide discretion opens the door to racial stereotyping. Twenty-nine
of the 30 women arrested as a result of this policy were black.
And who decides which harmful substances
to test for? At MUSC, women were tested and arrested only for cocaine.
Many substances can harm fetal health,
with alcohol and cigarettes in the lead, doing more damage in this country than
all illicit drugs combined.
If affirmed by the Supreme Court, this
policy would turn doctors into police officers, undermining the very foundation
of medical privacy rights. It would stretch the "special needs" exception to the
Fourth Amendment beyond the limits of constitutional protection. In the name of
protecting fetal health from the admittedly serious consequences of drug
addiction, it would swallow up not just the rights of pregnant women, but the
rights of all citizens to medical privacy.
Copyright 2000, Cox Interactive Media.
How To Pass A Drug Test Now
Information From Always Test Clean.
How to pass a
drug test is the question more and more people are faced with each and every day. Employee
screenings are on the rise, corporations have
their own rules and
random drug testing is often the condition of employment.
If this is the major concern in your life, you have come to the
right place. ATC products will shield you from detection of
controlled substances, prescription and non-prescription preparations, as well as other
things you might not want people to know about like tobacco usage. For
More Information check out our information to pass drug
test
ing. Return to Articles Menu
|