|
|
Urine Drug Test |
Hair Drug Test |
|
+

XXtra Clean
Free PreCleanse
($10 Value) |
+

Ready Clean
Free PreCleanse
($10 Value) |

PreCleanse
6 Herbal Capsules |

RU Clean
6 Panel Home Test |

Ultra
Clean
Simple To use |
|
For Heavy Users
 |
For Casual Users
 |
Boost Cleansing
 |
Test Yourself
 |
Hair Shampoo
 |
|
List $59.90
Now $44.95
Save $15 or 25%
|
List $44.90
Now $29.95
Save $15 or 33%
|
List $9.95
Now $9.95
No Discount
|
List $19.95
Now $24.95
Save $5 or 25%
|
List $39.95
Now $29.95
Save $10 or 25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One might think that looking for a job
should not be a cause for harassment by drug warriors, but as too many employees
already know, it is. How To Pass A Hair Sample Drug Test More Americans than ever are subjected to the invasive,
embarrassing and unnecessary process of urine collection for drug testing every
year.
False positive test results are possible.
Even when a false positive is corrected, it may have already damaged an
employee's reputation.
As far as employers are concerned, they
also appear to lose. The level of drug use in the workplace, and its effects,
are often overstated. When drug users are detected, they frequently are
satisfactory employees. And the cost of finding drug users can be enormous. One
report indicated that the federal government spent about $77,000 per positive
test, when the costs of all negative tests were taken into account. While many
claim that drug testing increases productivity in the workplace, a study
completed in 1998 indicates exactly the opposite: Companies that do random drug
testing tend to be less productive than companies that don't. Several observers
declare drug testing ineffective for these reasons. However, many employers
embrace the process enthusiastically. Some reasons why will be examined in the
next chapter about profiteers in the drug war.
Drug testing rates employees not on their
productivity or performance, but instead their ability to conform to company
policy, even in the privacy of their own homes. Giving up personal autonomy in
order to appease employers is another way the average worker loses in the war on
drugs. If the urine of the workers doesn't give them away, many companies have
started to hire private investigators to pose as employees and spy on them. This
policy is supposed to seek out illegal drug activity, but paid spies might have
other benefits for employers as well. Under the pretext of looking for drug
activity, the spies can monitor other types of activity, from time spent
fraternizing to attempts at union organizing, and anything else that might not
be in the company's best interest.
112. Hartwell, Tyler D.et al (November,
1996). "Prevalence of drug testing in the workplace," Monthly Labor Review, pp.
35-42. Hit "Back" button to return to text.
113. Holtdorf, Kent (1997). Ur-ine
Trouble. Scottsdale, Ariz.:Vandalay Press, pp. 33-55. Hit "Back" button to
return to text.
114. Potter, Beverly and Orfali, J.
Sebastian (1990). Drug Testing At Work. Berkely, Ca.: Ronin, pp. 47-55. Hit
"Back" button to return to text.
115. Crow, Stephen et al (Fall, 1992).
"Drugs in the Workplace," Journal of Drug Issues, pp. 923-937, especially pp.
931-932. Also see McDonald, Scott (Fall, 1995). "The Role of Drugs in Workplace
Injuries: Is Drug Testing Appropriate?" Journal of Drug Issues, pp. 703-721.
Also Osterloh, John et al (Oct., 1990). "Chemical Dependency and Drug Testing in
the Workplace." Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, pp. 407-411. Hit "Back" button to
return to text.
116. See reports from the American Civil
Liberties Union at http://www.aclu.org/library/pbp5.html and also Ligocki,
Kenneth (1997). Drug testing: What We All Need to Know. Bellingham, Wash. :
Scarborough Pub., pp. 139-146. Hit "Back" button to return to text.
117. Langton, Phyllis A. (1996). The
Social World of Drugs, p. 62. Hit "Back" button to return to text.
118. Shepard, Edward, et al (September,
1998). "Drug Testing and Labor Productivity: Estimates Applying a Production
Function Model." Le Moyne College Institute of Industrial Relations Research
Paper Number 18, pp. 1-30. Hit "Back" button to return to text.
119. Gilliom, John (1996). Surveillance,
Privacy and the Law: Employee Drug Testing and the Politics of Social Control.
Ann Arbor, Mich.: The University of Michigan Press, pp. 43-60. Hit "Back" button
to return to text.
120. Davis, Michelle (Oct. 12, 1997).
"Your coworker may be undercover narc." The Tennessean, p. 1. Hit "Back" button
to return to text.
How To Pass A Hair Sample Drug
Test Information From Always Test Clean.
How to pass a
drug test is the question more and more people are faced with each and every day. Employee
screenings are on the rise, corporations have
their own rules and
random drug testing is often the condition of employment.
If this is the major concern in your life, you have come to the
right place. ATC products will shield you from detection of
controlled substances, prescription and non-prescription preparations, as well as other
things you might not want people to know about like tobacco usage. For
More Information check out our information to
pass drug
test
ing. Return to Articles Menu
|